|
|
Course Details
Type |
SEM |
Credits Desc. |
2 cr. |
Credits Def. Value |
2 cr. |
Prerequisites |
Recommended, background in crim law, & public int'l law though not essential |
Senior Writing? |
(not listed) |
Student Year |
2L/3L |
When Offered |
(not listed) |
|
Description:
Collective Responsibility in Tort and Criminal Law: A Comparative Perspective
When can we hold who accountable and for what — This question is of central importance in the discourse of criminal law as well as tort law. The difficult task of answering it takes on an added dimension in cases of collective harms, which are typically perpetrated by a collective or group entity unto individuals who are also part of a collective. This course will concentrate on accountability for cases of collective and mass atrocity and the mechanisms for attributing responsibility, in crime as well as in tort, to the alleged perpetrators of these atrocities.
The modern law of torts and crime considers the individual as the paradigm unit of action as well as bearer of responsibility. This assumption comes under considerable strain in cases of mass atrocity where the entity sought to be held responsible is either a collective as in the case of tortious liability of corporations, or the individual as part of a collective, which is the typical scenario in international crimes such as genocide. We will analyse issues of collective and individual responsibility in tort and crime through an examination of select debates in law and philosophy, comparative and international criminal law, public international law, and the law of torts.
The specific areas covered in this course will include: law and philosophy literature on individual and collective intentions; the structure and basis of criminal responsibility in the common law and the civil law; accomplice and conspiracy liability in domestic jurisdictions; developments in international criminal law on joint criminal enterprise and co-perpetration; recent litigation under the Alien Torts Statute in the US and comparable cases elsewhere on the possibility of corporate tortious responsibility for severe human rights violations.
Recommended: Background knowledge in criminal law, tort law and public international law, though not essential, will be helpful.
|
show all
Sections
Type |
SEM |
Credits |
2 |
Prerequisites |
(none listed) |
Senior Writing? |
(not listed) |
Student Year |
2L/3L |
|
Details:
(see course description, above)
|
Documents and Readings:
- Access files on Inside.Law

- Syllabus
- Collective Responsibility (Lewis)
- Collective Responsibility (Naverson)
- Collective Responsibility (Cooper)
- The Rationality of Collective Guilt
- Collective Responsibility (Downie)
- Collective Moral Responsibility
- Shared Intentions and Shared Responsibility
- Who's to Blame? Collective Moral Responsibility and Its Implications for Group Members
- State Aggression, Collective Liability, and Individual Mens Rea
Available Online:
www.lib.umn.edu... +essential+maintenan
Citation: “State Aggression, Collective Liability, and Individual Mens Rea” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXX: 309–324 (2006)
Author(s): May, Larry
- What is It Like to Be a Group?
- Actions By Collectives
- Morality and Collective Liability
- Collective Responsibility (Feinberg)
- Can a Random Collection of Individuals be Responsible?
- The Responsibility of "Random Collections"
- Actions By Collectives
- Collective Responsibility and Duties to Respond
- Collective Responsibility (Narveson)
- The Question of German Guilt
- The Fujimori Judgment: A President’s Responsibility for Crimes Against Humanity as Indirect Perpetrator by Virtue of an Organized Power Apparatus
- Prosecutor v Tadić, Judgment, Case No IT-94-1
- Prosecutor v Brdanin, Judgment, Case No. IT-99-36-T
- Prosecutor v Brdanin, Judgment, Case No. IT-99-36-A
- Prosecutor v Milutinovic, Decision on Ojdanic’s Motion Challenging Jurisdiction, Case No. IT-05-87-PT
- Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise
- Amicus Curiae concerning Criminal Case File No. 001/18-07-2007-ECCC/OCIJ (PTC 02) (27 October 2008)
- Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: (2005) 93 California L Rev 75, 102-120, 132-146, 149-156, 159-169
Author(s): Allison Danner and Jenny Martinez
- Prosecutor v Stakic, Judgment, Case No. IT-97-24-T
- Prosecutor v Gacumbitsi, Judgment, Case No. ICTR-2001-64-A
- The Judgment Against Fujimori for Human Rights Violations (translation)
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: (2010) 25 American University International Law Review 657, pages 802-820
- Judgment on Human Rights Violations by Former Military Leaders, National Appeals Court (Criminal Division) for the Federal District of Buenos Aires, December 9, 1985
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: 26 International Legal Materials 317 (1987) pages 360-366
- Reflections of the Treatment of the Notions of Control of the Crime and Joint Criminal Enterprise in the Stakić Appeal Judgement
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: (2007) 7 Int’l Crim L Rev 143-161
Author(s): Héctor Olásolo
- Prosecutor v Lubanga, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06
- The Prosecutor v Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges
- On the Application of a Theory of Indirect Perpetration in Al Bashir: German Doctrine at the Hague?
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: (2008) 6 J of Int’l Criminal Justice 853
Author(s): Florian Jessberger and Julia Geneuss
- Why is the US Abdicating the Policing of Multinational Corporations to Europe?: Extraterritorialism, Sovereignty and the Alien Torts Statute
- Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: 542 U.S. 692 (2004)
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain et al.
- Conceptualizing Complicity in Alien Tort Cases
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: 60 Hastings L.J. 61 (2008-2009)
Conceptualizing Complicity in Alien Tort Cases
Author(s): Keitner, Chimene I.
- The Curious Case of Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute
Available Online:
HeinOnline (via Proxy)
Citation: 51 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 353 (2011)
Author(s): Julian Ku
|