Faculty in the News

Faculty News

  • Prof. McGeveran Comments on Uber Privacy Settlement

    August 15, 2017

    Professor William McGeveran, an expert in data privacy law, was quoted in Wired about the announcement of an FTC consent decree with the ride-sharing service Uber. It settles an FTC enforcement action over a breach of poorly secured customer data. McGeveran explained how the FTC has used past consent decrees, which last for 20 years, to increase its leverage over companies and improve their future privacy and data security practices.

  • Prof. Kitrosser Interviewed on WGN Radio's “Legal Face-Off”

    August 11, 2017

    Professor Heidi Kitrosser was interviewed on WGN Radio’s program, “Legal Face-Off.” The topic was the Trump Administration’s announced crackdown on leakers of classified information. Professor Kitrosser answered questions about the statutory basis for prosecuting information leaks, as well as the history of, and the free speech concerns raised by such prosecutions.

  • Professor Clary Interviewed About Legal Writing

    August 10, 2017

    Karin Ciano of the Minnesota Lawyer interviewed Professor Brad Clary recently on the subject of legal writing, and particularly on the subject of writing paragraphs. As one might expect, Professor Clary suggested that, “Writing good paragraphs takes effort.” Happily, he also offered specific advice. PDF iconA PDF of the article is attached.

  • Prof. Kitrosser Quoted in Los Angeles Times on Justice Department's Announced Leak Crackdown

    August 4, 2017

    Professor Heidi Kitrosser’s views were cited in a Los Angeles Times story entitled “Sessions Says Justice Department Will Boost Investigations of Leaks, May Pursue Reporters.” The story paraphrased Kitrosser as saying that the Espionage Act, which is the main law used to prosecute leakers of classified information, “is broad,” and that “far too many records are classified as secret, giving prosecutors the ability to target people who reveal wrongdoing.” Kitrosser also was quoted directly as explaining that “It becomes very easy for prosecutors to pick and choose to go after certain leakers, not because the information is dangerous, but because they want to send a message.”

  • Prof. Shen Quoted in Article on Disparate Police Calls to Walmart and Target

    August 1, 2017

    Professor Francis Shen was quoted in an article in the Hastings Star Gazette reporting on disparities in police calls to Walmart and to Target. The newspaper’s report found a nearly 4-1 ratio of police calls to Walmart as compared to Target. 

  • Prof. Kritzer’s Study of Polarization in Federal District Courts is Summarized on Law360

    July 31, 2017

    Law360 has summarized a study by Professor Herbert Kritzer and two collaborators that was recently posted on SSRN. The study shows that decisional patterns by federal district judges have becoming increasingly polarized based on the party of the appointing president. The study, which considered over 115,000 federal court decisions between 1934 and 2014, also showed that this increased polarization was due to increasing conservatism by appointees of Republican presidents.

  • Prof. McGeveran Discusses Problems with Voter Data Collection

    July 20, 2017

    Professor William McGeveran was quoted extensively in an article on Mic.com concerning recent controversial requests that states supply voter data to the federal Pence-Kobach Commission investigating alleged election fraud.

  • Prof. Cotter Discusses Antitrust Law on WCCO News

    July 13, 2017

    Professor Tom Cotter discussed the rules for proving the offense of monopolization under U.S. antitrust law for a WCCO News segment titled “Good Question: Is Amazon Getting Too Big?” Prof. Cotter noted that, under antitrust law, it isn’t an offense merely to be a big company or even a monopolist, but rather for a monopolist to engage in conduct that harms consumers.

  • Prof. Blumenthal Authors Washington Post News Analysis on the Execution of William Morva

    July 7, 2017

    Professor Susanna Blumenthal wrote a commentary for the Washington Post about the case of William Morva on the day set for his execution by the state of Virginia, pointing to the troubling gap between the Supreme Court’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, prohibiting the execution of the insane, and the everyday practices of courts in cases involving severely mentally ill defendants. “Unless and until we clarify what it means to be competent to be executed, death row inmates such as Morva deserve the benefit of the doubt,” wrote Blumenthal. “To proceed otherwise is to run the unacceptable risk of ‘killing one who has no capacity to come to grips with his own conscience or deity,’ as Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote in his 1986 opinion in Ford v. Wainwright. His words bear repetition today as the state of Virginia and its governor stand on the verge of ‘exacting a mindless vengeance.’”

  • Prof. Cotter’s Blog in Feedspot’s Top 100 I.P. Blogs Listing

    July 3, 2017

    Professor Tom Cotter’s blog, “Comparative Patent Remedies,” was recently listed on Feedspot’s list of Top 100 I.P. Blogs. According to Feedspot, the list includes “the Best Intellectual Property blogs from thousands of top Intellectual Property blogs in our index using search and social metrics… . These blogs are ranked based on following criteria: Google reputation and Google search ranking; Influence and popularity on Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites; Quality and consistency of posts; [and] Feedspot’s editorial team and expert review.” Cotter’s blog has had over 400,000 page hits since its launch in May 2013, and provides a constant update of his book “Comparative Patent Remedies: A Legal and Economic Analysis” (Oxford Univ. Press 2013).


E.g., Aug 18 2017
E.g., Aug 18 2017

Contact Information

University of Minnesota Law School

Walter F. Mondale Hall | 229 19th Avenue South | Minneapolis, MN 55455

P: 612-625-1000

Email Us

Connect on Social Media